Pupils’ First Experiences on Learning Adding Fractions in GeoGebra Applet

Authors

  • Kuntum Sharfina Putri Universitas Riau Author
  • Rinda Hidayati Akhromah Universitas Riau Author
  • Zetra Hainul Putra Universitas Riau Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/

Keywords:

Addition Fractions, Fractions, GeoGebra, Learning Mathematics

Abstract

GeoGebra is dynamic mathematics software that is utilized as an alternate learning media for studying Mathematics in the contemporary technology development period. Learning using GeoGebra can help students increase their knowledge of ideas and develop their mathematical thinking abilities. In this project, we apply a design research technique to create and test a GeoGebra exercise. The design study approach begins with the creation of GeoGebra-based activities on fraction addition by re-editing an existing GeoGebra design on the GeoGebra website and then testing it with five primary school students. Following the activity, we conducted interviews with students to determine the level of their comprehension of the idea of adding fractions. According to the findings of this study, pupils began to grasp and comprehend adding fractions since they could directly view how the fractions formed. However, some students continue to struggle with computer use owing to a lack of prior expertise.

References

Charles, K., & Nason, R. (2000). Young children’s partitioning strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(2), 191–221. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017513716026

Dewey, B. L., Singletary, T. J., & Kinzel, M. T. (2009). Graphing Calculator Use in Algebra Teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 109(7), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb17869.x

Dikovic, L. (2009). Implementing dynamic mathematics resources with geogebra at the college level. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 4(3), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v4i3.784

Dockendorff, M. (2018). ICT integration in mathematics initial teacher training and its impact on visualization: the case of GeoGebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1341060

Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In Educational design research (pp. 29–63). Routledge.

Hohenwarter, M., & Fuchs, K. (2005). Combination of dynamic geometry, algebra and calculus in the software system GeoGebra. In Computer Algebra Systems and Dynamic Geometry Systems in Mathematics Teaching (Sarvari, Cs. Hrsg.) (pp. 128–133).

Kabaca, T. (2013). Using dynamic mathematics software to teach one-variable inequalities by the view of semiotic registers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.917a

Lestari, S., Syahrilfuddin, S., Putra, Z. H., & Hermita, N. (2019). The effect of realistic mathematic approach on students’ learning motivation. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Elementary Education, 2(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.33578/jtlee.v2i2.7335

Mailizar, M., Almanthari, A., Maulina, S., & Bruce, S. (2020). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ views on e-learning implementation barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/8240

Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2021). Teaching mathematics with mobile devices and the Realistic Mathematical Education (RME) approach in kindergarten. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2021.01.002

Putra, Z. H. (2019). Praxeological change and the density of rational numbers: The case of pre-service teachers in Denmark and Indonesia. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105867

Putra, Z. H., Darmawijoyo, D., Putri, R. I. I., & den Hertog, J. (2011). Supporting first grade students learning number facts up to 10 using a parrot game. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.776.163-172

Putra, Z. H., Hermita, N., Alim, J. A., & Witri, G. (2021). Prospective elementary teachers’ experience with GeoGebra on the area of a triangle. Proceeding of 2021 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT), 816–819. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT52682.2021.9491790

Radović, S., Radojičić, M., Veljković, K., & Marić, M. (2020). Examining the effects of Geogebra applets on mathematics learning using interactive mathematics textbook. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1512001

Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. D. (2009). Student achievement effects of technology-supported remediation of understanding of fractions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(6), 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390902971999

Sembiring, R. K., Hadi, S., & Dolk, M. (2008). Reforming mathematics learning in Indonesian classrooms through RME. 40, 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0125-9

Trikoni, T. (2021). GeoGebra: Operasi pecahan - penjumlahan pecahan. https://www.geogebra.org/m/yn76nbzF

van Steenbrugge, H., Lesage, E., Valcke, M., & Desoete, A. (2014). Preservice elementary school teachers’ knowledge of fractions: A mirror of students’ knowledge? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.839003

Weinhandl, R. (2020). Enhancing flipped mathematics education by utilising GeoGeBrA. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.46328/IJEMST.V8I1.832

Yaǧmur, S., & Çaǧiltay, K. (2013). A usability study of dynamic geometry software’s interfaces. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 373, Issue PART I, pp. 175–179). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39473-7_36

Downloads

Published

2025-05-13

How to Cite

Pupils’ First Experiences on Learning Adding Fractions in GeoGebra Applet. (2025). Indonesian Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.33578/